Antecubital Burn Resulting From Antenna Coupling: A Case Report.

CASE: We present the case of a 54-year-old man who underwent elective hip disarticulation complicated by third-degree burn of the left antecubital fossa requiring skin graft. After careful review, it was determined that "antenna coupling" as a result of electrosurgery was the likely cause. We present an experiment demonstrating this phenomenon. CONCLUSION: Antenna coupling is a real but rare cause of intraoperative burns not previously described in the orthopaedic literature. Care should be taken to avoid coiling or running bovie or other electrosurgical device cords with other metallic cords or corded devices.

Focused ultrasound versus the loop electrosurgical excision procedure to treat women with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions under 40: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of focused ultrasound (FUS) and the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for the treatment of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) among women of reproductive age. METHODS: Case records of patients aged < 40 years who were treated for cervical HSILs using either FUS or LEEP from September 1, 2020 to May 31, 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were followed up for cure, recurrence, human papillomavirus (HPV) clearance, and complications within 1 year of treatment. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were determined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models to analyze the association between disease evidence or HPV clearance and treatment modalities or other covariates. RESULTS: Of the 1,054 women who underwent FUS or LEEP, 225 met our selection criteria. Among the selected women, 101 and 124 received FUS and LEEP, respectively. There was no significant difference between the FUS and LEEP groups in the cure rate during the 3-6 months of follow-up (89.11% vs. 94.35%, P = 0.085) and recurrence rate during the 6-12 months follow-up (2.22% vs. 1.71%, P = 0.790). Both groups exhibited enhanced cumulative HPV clearance rates; however, the rates were not significantly different between the FUS and LEEP groups (74.23% vs. 82.79%, P = 0.122 during the 3-6 months follow-up; 84.95% vs. 89.17%, P = 0.359 during the 6-12 months follow-up). Furthermore, the incidence of complications caused by the FUS and LEEP techniques was comparable (5.0% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.818). CONCLUSIONS: We found that FUS and LEEP have similar efficacy, safety, and reliability in treating women (aged < 40 years) with HSILs.

Risk of Monopolar Electrosurgery in Cochlear Implant Recipients is Nominal: Evidence to Guide Clinical Practice.

OBJECTIVE: Comprehensively assess the prevalence of monopolar electrosurgery-related device complications among cochlear implant (CI) recipients. STUDY DESIGN: Multifaceted retrospective review and survey. SETTING: Tertiary medical center. METHODS: Multifaceted approach including: (i) review of the current literature; (ii) historical review of institutional data from an academic, tertiary CI center; (iii) review of industry data provided by 3 Food and Drug Administration-approved CI manufacturers; and (iv) survey of high-volume CI centers. RESULTS: Literature review identified 9 human studies, detailing 84 devices with 199 episodes of device-cautery exposure. From studies reporting on patients records, no implant showed evidence of damage after exposure. One cadaveric study using dental cautery reported 1 episode of device damage. Review of institutional records did not identify any CI damage in 84 instances of exposure. Data from the 3 major implant manufacturers showed a single report of damage that could be reasonably linked to monopolar electrosurgery, out of a possible 689,426 CIs. Last, a survey of 8 high-volume CI centers did not identify any adverse events associated with monopolar cautery. CONCLUSION: These data estimate the risk of adverse device-related events or tissue injury to be extraordinarily low. Short of operating in immediate proximity to the CI (ie, the ipsilateral temporoparietal scalp), these data indicate that monopolar electrosurgery can be used in the body and the head-and-neck of CI recipients with nominal risk. These findings may guide decision-making in cases that are optimally or preferably performed with monopolar electrocautery and can be used to counsel CI patients following inadvertent exposures.

A prospective cohort study of a new electrosurgical unit for preventing colorectal post-endoscopic submucosal dissection coagulation syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection coagulation syndrome (PECS) is a recognized complication of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); however, there is a lack of interventions for preventing PECS. We therefore conducted a prospective study to evaluate the utility of maXium, a novel electrosurgical unit, for preventing PECS. METHODS: This single-center, prospective cohort study prospectively enrolled patients undergoing colorectal ESD. The voltage and power of the electrosurgical units were measured. PECS was defined as a visual analog scale (VAS) ≥ 30 mm, an increase of VAS ≥ 20 mm from baseline, body temperature ≥ 37.5°C, or white blood cell count ≥ 10 000/µL after ESD. PECS was classified into type I (without extra-luminal air) and type II (with peri-luminal air). The primary endpoint was the incidence of PECS. A sample size of 92 patients was required to ensure the upper limit of the 90% CI for the incidence of PECS was less than 15%. RESULTS: At resistances greater than 400 Ω, the maXium unit allowed submucosal dissection with lower power than with the VIO300D unit. Ninety-one patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the final study analysis. The incidence of PECS was 16% (90% CI, 10-23%), comprising type I (11%) and type II (5%) PECS. Simple extra-luminal air without PECS was observed in 7% of patients. CONCLUSION: Use of the maXium electrosurgical unit did not reduce the incidence of PECS after colorectal ESD; however, the maXium unit had equivalent performance to a conventional electrosurgical unit used for colorectal ESD.

Transvaginal small bowel evisceration after cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a case report.

Transvaginal small bowel evisceration is a life-threatening condition, which is usually seen in postmenopausal women with a history of gynecological surgery. Cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is widely used in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and its surgical risk and postoperative complications are relatively low because of the simplicity of the operation. However, improper operation may result in perforation of the uterus, which can cause prolapse of the small bowel into the vagina. We here reported an extremely rare case of a young woman with transvaginal small bowel evisceration after cervical LEEP, achieving a good prognosis after the prolapsed bowel was reduced. The patient underwent cervical LEEP as a treatment for CIN III, but the LEEP resulted in a laceration of about 4.0 cm × 3.5 cm on the peritoneum of the uterovesical peritoneal reflection and a laceration of about 2.0 cm × 1.5 cm on the anterior wall of the cervical canal. Through the two lacerations, the pelvic cavity is connected to the vagina and the small intestine prolapsed into the vagina. Due to aggressive surgical intervention, the patient achieved a favorable prognosis after successfully reducing the prolapsed bowel.

Efficacy of recombinant bovine basic fibroblast growth factor to reduce hemorrhage after cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedure.

OBJECTIVE: It has been reported that recombinant bovine basic fibroblast growth factor (rbFGF) may possess possible biological functions in promoting the process of wound healing. Consequently, our study aimed to investigate the hemostatic effect of topically applied rbFGF in patients who underwent a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we meticulously examined clinicopathologic data from a cohort of 90 patients who underwent LEEP at our institution between 2020 and 2021. Subsequently, we conducted inquiries with the patients to ascertain the degree of vaginal bleeding experienced during the postoperative periods of 3 and 6 weeks, comparing it to their preoperative menstrual flow. The magnitude of the menstrual volume alteration was then quantified using a menstrual volume multiplier(MVM). The primary endpoints of our investigation were to assess the hemostatic effect of rbFGF by means of evaluating the MVM. Additionally, the secondary endpoints encompassed the assessment of treatment-related side effects of such as infection and dysmenorrhea. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrated a significant reduction in hemorrhage following cervical LEEP. Specifically, in the per-protocol analysis, the study group exhibited a statistically significantly decrease in MVM after 3 weeks (0 [0-0] vs. 1 [0-1], respectively; p < 0.001) and after 6 weeks (1 [1] vs. 2 [1-3], respectively; p < 0.001) of the procedure. No notable disparities were observed in the remaining outcomes between the two groups. Moreover, a logistic regression analysis was employed to explore the relationship between significant bleeding and rbFGF treatment (p < 0.001, OR = -2.47, 95% CI -4.07 ~-1.21), while controlling for confounding factors such as age, BMI, and surgical specimen. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our study findings highlight that the application of recombinant bovine basic fibroblast growth factorcan effectively mitigate hemorrhage subsequent to cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedure.

Electrosurgical unit in GI endoscopy: the proper settings for practice.

INTRODUCTION: Electrosurgical unit (ESU) is integral to the endoscopy unit. The proper knowledge of the Mode with setting is essential for good therapeutic outcomes and the safety of the patients. AREAS COVERED: ESU generates high-frequency electric current, which could perform cutting and coagulation for various therapeutic interventions. We review the proper settings for common endoscopic interventions like hemostasis, polypectomy, sphincterotomy, and advanced procedures like endoscopic ultrasound-guided cysto-gastrostomy, bile duct drainage, and endoscopic Ampullectomy. We review the various waveforms of ESU in practice in endoscopy, including special conditions like patients with pacemakers. EXPERT OPINION: Knowledge of the waveforms' duty cycle and crest factor is necessary. A high-duty cycle and lower crest factor lead to a good cutting effect on the tissue. Endocut is the most commonly used Mode in ESU in endoscopic practices like sphincterotomy and polypectomy. Endocut I mode (effect 1-2, duration 3, interval 3) is used for endoscopic sphincterotomy, while Forced Coag mode (Effect 2, 60 W) controls post-sphincterotomy bleeding. Endocut Q mode (Effect 2-3, duration 1, interval 3) is used for cutting the polyp, while Forced Coag mode (Effect 2, 60 W) is used before cutting for pre-coagulation of the stalk.

How endocervicoscopy can impact obstetric outcomes in women undergoing LEEP for CIN2 + : a retrospective cohort analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of preoperative endocervicoscopy on obstetric outcomes and complications in women undergoing LEEP for CIN2 + . METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study carried out between October 2012 and April 2018. All women had undergone cervical length measurement at T0 (before LEEP), T1 (6 months after LEEP), and T2 (at 20 weeks of pregnancy) through transvaginal ultrasound examination after LEEP for CIN2 + . A total of 528 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria and contributed to the final analysis: 288 had undergone endocervicoscopy before the excisional procedure (Group A), while the remaining 240 (Group B) did not. RESULTS: Patients who did not undergo endocervicoscopy showed a greater amount of tissue excised at LEEP compared to those of Group A (6.7% vs 31.9% in Group A and B, p < 0.01, respectively). A statistically relevant difference was detected in the lesion margins involvement: negative in 93.8% in Group A compared to 65.6% in Group B. The cervicometry before the treatment resulted in similar between the two groups, while a statistically significant difference was noted after 6 months (37.5 ± 2.9 mm in Group A vs 35.1 ± 3.8 mm in Group B, p < 0.01) and at 20th week pregnancy (36.9 ± 5.3 mm in Group A vs 33.5 ± 5.6 mm in Group B, p < 0.01). The number of pregnancies after LEEP as well as the difference in the elapsed time (in months) did not result in a statistical significance between the two groups. The threatened preterm labor (TPL) and the threatened miscarriage showed a statistically significant difference in incidence between the two groups (4,2% and 4.2% in Group A vs 15.3% and 25% in Group B, p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Endocervicoscopy reduces the size of the LEEP sample and in particular its depth, saving healthy cervical tissue, and guarantees the total eradication of the lesion as the resection margins are negative in almost all cases, allowing for a reduction of the rate of TPL and threatened miscarriage in women with CIN2 + , especially with Type 2 or 3 cervical squamocolumnar junction (SCJ).

Effect of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure on Sexual Dysfunction in Korean Women.

BACKGROUND: The role of the cervix in female sexual functioning is controversial. The loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) induces structural changes in the cervix. This study aimed to investigate whether LEEP affected sexual dysfunction in Korean women. METHODS: A prospective cohort study enrolled 61 sexually active women with abnormal Papanicolaou smear or cervical punch biopsy results and required LEEP. The patients were assessed before and six to twelve months after LEEP using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS). RESULTS: The prevalence of female sexual dysfunction according to FSFI scores before and after LEEP was 62.5% and 66.7%, respectively. LEEP-related changes in total FSFI and FSDS scores were not significant (P = 0.399 and P = 0.670, respectively). The frequency of sexual dysfunction in the desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain subdomains of the FSFI was not significantly altered by LEEP (P > 0.05). The proportion of women experiencing sexual distress according to FSDS scores did not significantly increase after LEEP (P = 0.687). CONCLUSION: A large proportion of women with cervical dysplasia experience sexual dysfunction and distress both before and after LEEP. LEEP itself may be not associated with negative effects on female sexual function.

Influence of General and Local Anesthesia on Postoperative Pain After a Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patient satisfaction, histopathologic results, and short-term morbidity in patients undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) under local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia (GA). METHODS: Participants who met the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the LA group or GA group. Pain was determined by both objective (faces pain scale-revised) and subjective (visual analog scale score) methods. RESULTS: Data from 244 patients (123 in the LA group and 121 in the GA group) were analyzed. The median cone volume was 2.0 (0.4-4.7) cm 3 in the LA group and 2.4 (0.3-4.8) cm 3 in the GA group. There was no difference in margin involvement or repeat conization between the groups. The procedure time, time to complete hemostasis, intraoperative blood loss, and early postoperative blood loss were similar between the groups. The visual analog scale scores were higher in the LA group at 1, 2, and 4 hours postoperatively, but the differences between the groups were not significant. In addition, the median faces pain scale-revised scores at 1, 2, and 4 hours postoperatively were not significantly different between the LA and GA groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed no difference in pain during the postoperative period, need for additional analgesia, volume of the extracted cone specimens, rate of positive surgical margin, bleeding volume, or operation time in women undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure under LA versus GA.

Monopolar Electrosurgery With Cochlear Implants.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety of monopolar electrosurgery (MES) in patients with cochlear implants (CIs) by reporting outcomes of a series of patients who underwent MES after CI. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients with indwelling CI subsequently undergoing surgery with operative note specifically detailing MES use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse outcomes in post-operative audiology/otolaryngology documentation; speech recognition scores. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (10 with bilateral CI) experienced 63 unique MES exposure events, 85.7% below and 14.3% above the clavicle. No adverse events or decreased performance due to MES use were reported for any patient. Pre- and immediate postoperative speech recognition scores were not significantly different for patients using either consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC; n = 23, 68%-66%, p = 0.80) or AzBio (n = 15, 82%-88%, p = 0.60). For individual CNC performance, 21 (91%) patients demonstrated stability, 1 improved >15%, and 1 declined >15%, although this patient had become a non-user due to magnet issues and, after resolution of these issues, exceeded baseline pre-operative score. For individual AzBio performance, 12 (80%) patients demonstrated stability, 3 improved >15%, and none declined >15%. CONCLUSIONS: No adverse events resulted from MES use in CI patients. Given the increased prevalence and expansion of indications for CIs, and widespread utility of MES, we suggest clarification and improved guidance from device manufacturers regarding safety and use of MES for patients with these devices. We hope that data regarding electrosurgery exposure events will better inform clinician decision-making with regards to relative benefits and risks for MES use for CI patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:933-937, 2023.

Association between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: The databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of science were searched from inception to December 27th, 2020. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were utilized to calculate the association between LEEP and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Heterogeneity test was performed for each outcome effect amount. If I2 ≥ 50%, the random-effects model was conducted, otherwise, fixed-effects model was performed. Sensitivity analysis was performed on all outcomes. Publication bias was performed by Begg's test. RESULTS: A total of 30 studies containing 2,475,421 patients were included in this study. The results showed that patients who received the LEEP before pregnancy had a higher risk of preterm delivery (OR: 2.100, 95%CI: 1.762-2.503, p < .001), premature rupture of fetal membranes (OR: 1.989, 95%CI: 1.630-2.428, p < .001) and low birth weight infants (OR: 1.939, 95%CI: 1.617-2.324, p < .001) in comparison with controls. Subgroup analysis further found that prenatal LEEP treatment was associated with the risk of preterm birth subsequently. CONCLUSION: LEEP treatment before pregnancy may increase the risk of preterm delivery, premature rupture of fetal membranes and low birth weight infants. It is necessary to do a regular prenatal examination and early intervention in a timely manner to reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes after LEEP.

Surgeons know that they don't know about the safe use of surgical energy: an international study reveals that the knowledge gap persists.

INTRODUCTION: The rate of electrosurgery complications is 0.1-2.1%. More than 10 years ago, SAGES pioneered a well-structured educational program (FUSE) aimed to teach about the safe use of electrosurgery. This inspired the development of similar training programs around the globe. Still, the knowledge gap persists among surgeons, possibly due to the lack of judgment. AIM: To investigate factors affecting the level of expertise in electrosurgical safety and their correlation with self-assessment scores among surgeons and surgical residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an online survey consisting of 15 questions that could be thematically broken down into 5 blocks. We analyzed how the objective scores were correlated with the self-assessment scores, professional experience, past participation in training programs, and work at a teaching hospital. RESULTS: A total of 145 specialists took part in the survey, including 111 general surgeons and 34 s-year surgical residents from Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, and Kirgizia. Only 9 (8.1%) surgeons scored "excellent," 32 (28.8%) scored "good," and 56 (50.4%) scored "fair." Of all surgical residents participating in the study, only 1 (2.9%) scored "excellent," 9 (26.5%) scored "good," and 11 (32.4%) scored "fair." The test was failed by 14 surgeons (12.6%) and 13 (38.2%) residents. The difference between the trainees and the surgeons was statistically significant. Our multivariate logistic model identified 3 significant factors predisposing to successful performance on the test: past training in the safe use of electrosurgery, professional experience, and work at a teaching hospital. Of all study participants, those with no past training in the safe use of electrosurgery, and non-teaching surgeons were the most realistic about their competencies. CONCLUSION: We have identified alarming gaps in the knowledge of electrosurgical safety among surgeons. Faculty staff and experienced surgeons scored higher, but past training was the most influential factor in improving knowledge of electrosurgical safety.

Transcatheter Electrosurgery: A Narrative Review.

Transcatheter electrosurgery describes the ability to cut and traverse tissue, at a distance, without an open surgical field and is possible using either purpose-built or off-the-shelf devices. Tissue traversal requires focused delivery of radiofrequency energy to a guidewire tip. Initially employed to cross atretic pulmonary valves, tissue traversal has enabled transcaval aortic access, recanalization of arterial and venous occlusions, transseptal access, and many other techniques. To cut tissue, the selectively denuded inner curvature of a kinked guidewire (the Flying-V) or a single-loop snare is energized during traction. Adjunctive techniques may complement or enable contemporary transcatheter procedures, whereas myocardial slicing or excision of ectopic masses may offer definitive therapy. In this contemporary review we discuss the principles of transcatheter electrosurgery, and through exemplary clinical applications highlight the range of therapeutic options offered by this versatile family of procedures.

Carbon Dioxide Laser Transconjunctival Lower Blepharoplasty: An Objective and Quantitative Comparison to Monopolar Electrosurgery.

BACKGROUND: The ability to simultaneously cut and perform hemostasis with low lateral thermal injury makes carbon dioxide laser a useful tool in blepharoplasty. Monopolar electrosurgery is another commonly used cutting tool that improves the quality of hemostasis and cutting speed. This study aimed to objectively and quantitatively assess the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty using either a carbon dioxide laser or monopolar electrosurgery. METHODS: Between August of 2018 and March of 2021, 78 patients who underwent transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty were assigned randomly to the carbon dioxide laser group or the monopolar electrosurgery group. Patient-related parameters were recorded. Periorbital bruises were assessed objectively and quantitatively using the ecchymosis evaluation score. Analyses were performed using the independent sample t test, the Mann-Whitney U test, the chi-square test, and the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Sex, age, local anesthesia injection volume, and fat removal volume were not different between the groups. Patients' subjective intraoperative heat sensation was significantly higher in the monopolar electrosurgery group than in the carbon dioxide laser group. The carbon dioxide laser group had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative chemosis than the monopolar electrosurgery group. All patients had uncomplicated wound healing, except three (7.89%) patients in the monopolar electrosurgery group who developed conjunctival granuloma. Operation time, intraoperative pain sensation, intraoperative blood pressure, postoperative ecchymosis, conjunctivitis, and patients' aesthetic satisfaction did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: The authors' findings revealed that carbon dioxide laser is a useful technique for reducing intraoperative heat sensation and postoperative chemosis and may prevent conjunctival wound complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Pregnancy outcome and risk of recurrence after tissue-preserving loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate whether women with cervical dysplasia after LEEP have an increased risk of pregnancy/childbirth complications or recurrence of dysplasia in an upcoming pregnancy. METHODS: Data from 240 women after LEEP were analysed retrospectively. The reference group consisted of 956 singleton births. Fisher's and Wilcoxon rank tests were used to detect differences between groups. Using logistic regressions, we analysed the effect of surgery-specific aspects of LEEP on pregnancy/childbirth complications and the frequency of CIN recurrences. RESULTS: We found that tissue-preserving LEEP did not lead to premature birth or miscarriage and did not increase the likelihood of CIN recurrence. We did not observe differences regarding preterm birth [< 37 (p < 0.28) < 34 (p < 0.31), < 32 weeks of gestation (p < 0.11)] or birth weight (< 2500 g (p < 0.54), < 2000 g (p < 0.77) between groups. However, women after LEEP exhibit a higher risk of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at term (p < 0.009) and vaginal infections (p < 0.06). Neither volume nor depth of the removed tissue nor an additional endocervical resection seems to influence the likelihood of premature birth or early miscarriage. Performing an endocervical resection protects against CIN recurrence (OR 0.0881, p < 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: After tissue-preserving LEEP, there is an increased risk of vaginal infections and PROM at term in consecutive pregnancy. LEEP does not affect prematurity or miscarriage. The removal of additional endocervical tissue appears to be a protective factor against recurrence of CIN.

[Safety in electrosurgery: results of the All-Russian survey]. / Bezopasnost' v elektrokhirurgii: rezul'taty obshcherossiiskogo oprosa urovnya znanii.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of knowledge in electrosurgical safety among specialists in the Russian Federation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An Internet survey was devoted to the issues of electrosurgical safety. The questionnaire consisted of 15 questions in 5 items. Data were collected for 2 months. Data analysis included final assessment of respondents, correlation of results with their own assessment of knowledge and parameters of surgical experience, the fact of training and belonging to the department. Question design, survey and presentation of results were performed in accordance with the CHERRIES (Check list of Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys) criteria for Internet surveys. RESULTS: Survey enrolled 231 specialists. Excellent rating was given to 13 (5.6%) respondents, good - 66 (28.3%), satisfactory - 105 (45.1%) respondents. Forty-nine (21.03%) respondents did not overcome the passing score (7) and showed unsatisfactory knowledge of electrosurgical safety. Mean score among all participants was 8.6±2.6 (median 8 points, interquartile range [7-11]) or 53.3% of maximum value (15). In multivariate logistic model, significant factors were the completed course in electrosurgical safety (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.30-3.97; p=0.004), experience of work (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05; p=0.011) and work in the department (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.03-2.95; p=0.038). Respondents who did not take the course (positive significant correlation r=0.1629, p=0.02674) and non-departmental employees (r=0.1655, p=0.031) assess the level of knowledge more adequately with respect to real results. Respondents with completed course (r=0.1078, p=0.4659) and departmental staff (r=0.1411, p=0.2699) are prone to overestimate self-assessment (positive insignificant correlation of their own assessment and received points). CONCLUSION: We found significant knowledge gaps in electrosurgical safety among various practitioners. The main causes are no mandatory specialized courses on electrosurgical safety and insufficient motivation of specialists for self-education due to false ideas about their own level of knowledge.

Obstetric outcomes after cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedure.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate whether a history of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (i.e., conisation) affects obstetric and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out in Västernorrland county, Sweden. 57 nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies and previous conisation were compared with 100 age-matched pregnant controls without history of conisation. RESULTS: There was significantly lower gestational age by delivery (p = 0.036), however, the premature delivery rate was not different. Caesarean section was also less frequent (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.081-1.04, p = 0.047) in the conisation group than those in the control group. There were no differences in neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Previous conisation does not affect the risk of prematurity or cervical dilatation during the first stage of labour. Women with history of conisation had a lower rate of caesarean section, and lower gestational age by delivery.

Understanding the Principles of Electrosurgery for Endoscopic Surgery and Third Space Endoscopy.

Electrosurgery is the application of high-frequency electrical alternating current to biologic tissue to cut, coagulate, desiccate, and/or fulgurate. Electrosurgery is commonly used in gastrointestinal endoscopy, with applications including biliary sphincterotomy, polypectomy, hemostasis, the ablation of lesions, and endoscopic surgery. Understanding electrosurgical principles is important in endoscopic surgery to achieve the desired therapeutic effect, optimize procedural outcomes, and minimize risks or adverse events. This article describes fundamental principles that apply to electrosurgical units, operator technique, and practical considerations for achieving desired tissue effects in endoscopic surgery; and provides practical guidance and safety considerations when using electrosurgical units in endoscopic surgery.